R.Du Hyun RoOrthopedics & Research
Text
← The Story of Research

arthritis inspection and surveillance · 2026

X-rays and MRI Show Different Aspects of Osteoarthritis

Long-term follow-up of the same knees showed that cartilage and meniscal changes occurred in different sequences depending on location.

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy · Do Weon Lee, Ji-Sahn Kim, Hyuk-Soo Han, Du Hyun Ro

Original Figure 1

In an MRI, you divide the cartilage and cranial bone in front of A; in the middle of C; behind P. The same knee can vary the amount of tissue change depending on location, so we've broken down the layout.Enlarge Figure

In an MRI, you divide the cartilage and cranial bone in front of A; in the middle of C; behind P. The same knee can vary the amount of tissue change depending on location, so we've broken down the layout.

Do Weon Lee, Ji-Sahn Kim, Hyuk-Soo Han, Du Hyun Ro. Longitudinal correlation between X-ray and MRI findings in medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: Insights into early cartilage loss and structural changes. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2026;34(6):2047–2056. https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.70016. © 2025 The Author(s).

Evidence & Original SourceImage use terms
Original Figure Legend

Figure 1

01

The X-ray intervals also contain the effects of cartilage.

An X-ray may show narrowing between the bones, but joint space is not a direct measure of cartilage thickness alone. Meniscal position and damage, and imaging posture, also matter. MRI distinguishes cartilage, meniscal, and bone-marrow lesions in greater detail. This study examined how information from the two tests relates over time.

02

So we divided the same knee into locations.

The study analyzed 3,710 knees over 7 years in MOST. Central and posterior MRI regions were assessed for cartilage damage, meniscal damage/extrusion and bone changes against X-ray grades. A, C and P mean anterior, central and posterior, distinguishing patterns that can differ within one knee.

03

We've seen different patterns in the center and back.

Cartilage changes appeared first centrally, while meniscal changes appeared first posteriorly. Tibial osteophytes were relatively early X-ray findings. Boxes and points show group distributions, not an identical sequence or precise timetable for every patient.

Original Figure 2

MRI findings of cartilage, meniscus and bone marrow in the central compartment are compared by X-ray KL grade.Enlarge Figure

MRI findings of cartilage, meniscus and bone marrow in the central compartment are compared by X-ray KL grade.

Do Weon Lee, Ji-Sahn Kim, Hyuk-Soo Han, Du Hyun Ro. Longitudinal correlation between X-ray and MRI findings in medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: Insights into early cartilage loss and structural changes. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2026;34(6):2047–2056. https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.70016. © 2025 The Author(s).

Original Figure Legend

Figure 2

04

Meniscal extrusion emerged as an important finding

Meniscal extrusion beyond the joint margin had the strongest association among the examined indicators of later progression. Cartilage damage and meniscal tears were also associated. This does not prove that treating extrusion alone stops arthritis. The imaging associations provide a basis for further research and clinical evaluation.

05

Do you have to take an MRI for arthritis?

These findings do not recommend routine MRI for every patient. Symptoms, examination, and X-rays when needed remain important in OA assessment. Additional testing should address a specific clinical question, such as unexplained symptoms or suspected associated injury. Research seeks detailed tissue information; clinical care first asks what question a test will answer.

Look at the study numbers again.

3,710Knees included in the analysis
7 yearsMOST observational data
Anterior · Middle · PosteriorRegions examined separately
RESEARCH FINDINGknee

Composition of the study sample

Knees included in the analysis
3,710
02,1334,267
Counts of data included in the study. These do not show treatment effects or an individual’s risk.

Common Questions

Can we apply these results directly to individual therapies?

These findings do not recommend routine MRI for every patient. Symptoms, examination, and X-rays when needed remain important in OA assessment. Additional testing should address a specific clinical question, such as unexplained symptoms or suspected associated injury. Research seeks detailed tissue information; clinical care first asks what question a test will answer.

Methods and Numbers in Detail

Longitudinal correlation between X-ray and MRI findings in medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: Insights into early cartilage loss and structural changes

Participants and Methods

The study included 3,710 knees; the original MOST cohort was aged 50–79 years.

The study used 7-year MOST follow-up data. Imaging findings were compared in knees with predominantly medial OA and same-time X-rays and MRI, followed by longitudinal regression analysis.

Results Reported in the Paper

  1. Centrally, meniscal and bone changes followed cartilage damage; posteriorly, meniscal changes appeared first. Central femoral cartilage loss was observed even at KL 0.
  2. X-ray changes occurred in the order of tibial osteophytes, joint-space narrowing and femoral osteophytes. Meniscal extrusion, cartilage loss and meniscal tears were associated with progression (P < 0.001), most strongly for extrusion.

Scope of Interpretation

The observed correlations do not establish the causal sequence of pathological changes. The study did not demonstrate that MRI improves surgical outcomes or is necessary for every patient with KL 0.

Keywords

Abstract · Original text

Do Weon Lee, Ji-Sahn Kim, Hyuk-Soo Han, Du Hyun Ro. Longitudinal correlation between X-ray and MRI findings in medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: Insights into early cartilage loss and structural changes. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA. 2026;34(6):2047-2056. doi:10.1002/ksa.70016.

PURPOSE

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a common joint disorder assessed using radiographic (X-ray) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). While X-rays are accessible, MRI provides detailed insights into meniscus and cartilage. Few studies have evaluated the correlation between X-ray and MRI findings in knee OA longitudinally. This study addresses this gap by investigating their relationship over time.

METHODS

The Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (MOST) dataset, a public, longitudinal cohort study focusing on knee OA in older adults, was used. The analysis included 3710 knees with medial compartment OA from different follow-ups over the course of 7 years. X-ray findings were compared with MRI findings, encompassing cartilage, meniscal and bone pathologies.

RESULTS

In the central compartment, knee OA progression began with cartilage loss, followed by meniscal and bone pathology, while in the posterior compartment, meniscal changes preceded cartilage and bone lesions. Cartilage loss in the central femur was the earliest event, even in Kellgren-Lawrence grade 0 knees, preceding X-ray changes. Tibial osteophytes developed first on X-ray, followed by joint space narrowing and femoral osteophytes. Longitudinal regression identified meniscal extrusion, cartilage loss and meniscal tear as significant predictors of OA progression (p < 0.001), with meniscal extrusion being the strongest.

CONCLUSION

Knee OA progression differs by compartment, with cartilage loss initiating changes centrally and meniscal pathology leading posteriorly. Tibial osteophytes appear early on X-ray. Meniscal extrusion is the strongest predictor of OA progression, highlighting the importance of MRI in identifying early changes and guiding personalised management.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

© 2025 The Author(s). Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy.