R.Du Hyun RoOrthopedics & Research
Text
Paper Library
AIJSWOA progressionimaging biomarker
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

2025 · Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

Deep-learning oJSW measurement and quantitative joint-space narrowing assessment

AUCs for discriminating JSN >0, >1 and >2 were 0.86, 0.95 and 0.97, respectively. The abstract summarises the absolute AUC advantage over fixed-location JSW as 0.04–0.08. These are cross-sectional discrimination results, not an individual’s probability of future osteoarthritis progression.

Results explained with study numbers

AUC was 0.86 for the earliest JSN distinction and 0.95 and 0.97 for more advanced stages.Enlarge Figure

AUC was 0.86 for the earliest JSN distinction and 0.95 and 0.97 for more advanced stages.

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy (2025). DOI: 10.1002/ksa.70227 · Original explanatory chart based on reported data

Evidence & Original SourceImage use terms

The research question

Is Orthogonal Minimum JSW More Sensitive to Severity and Change Than JSW at Fixed Locations?

Participants and Methods

A retrospective OAI analysis compared automated AI measurements with fixed-location measurements at 22.5% and 25%. ROC curves for JSN grades and SRM over 12-month intervals were evaluated using 1,000 bootstrap iterations. 15,313 knee radiographs, from baseline through 72 months.

Main Findings

AUCs for discriminating JSN >0, >1 and >2 were 0.86, 0.95 and 0.97, respectively. The abstract summarises the absolute AUC advantage over fixed-location JSW as 0.04–0.08. These are cross-sectional discrimination results, not an individual’s probability of future osteoarthritis progression. The abstract summarises an approximately 2–4% improvement in relative responsiveness to change on repeat imaging. AUC for discriminating current JSN severity and responsiveness to longitudinal change are separate evaluations.

Implications for clinical and surgical practice

It is a candidate continuous structural imaging measure for OA research and joint-preserving treatment trials.

Limitations

The AUC describes cross-sectional discrimination of JSN severity, not prediction of an individual’s future progression. Pain and surgical effects were not evaluated.

Let's put it briefly.

Which clinical question does this address?

It is a candidate continuous structural imaging measure for OA research and joint-preserving treatment trials.

Keywords

Abstract · Original text

Do Weon Lee, Dae Seok Song, Yong Seuk Lee, Ja-Young Choi, Du Hyun Ro. Deep learning-derived orthogonal minimum joint space width improves radiographic assessment of knee osteoarthritis severity and progression. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA. 2025. doi:10.1002/ksa.70227.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the performance of a novel orthogonal minimum joint space width, defined as the narrowest distance measured orthogonally to the tibial joint line within a standardised medial axis, for detecting and monitoring knee osteoarthritis progression. This artificial intelligence-derived metric, obtained through deep learning, was compared with conventional fixed-location joint space width measures.

METHODS

A total of 15,313 knee radiographs from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI), spanning baseline to 72-month follow-up, were analysed in this retrospective cohort study. Orthogonal minimum joint space width was automatically measured using a deep learning model. Discriminative ability for cross-sectional joint space narrowing severity was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Longitudinal responsiveness was evaluated with the standardised response mean and relative standardised response mean, computed from pooled 12-month intervals and stratified by baseline narrowing grade. Variability was estimated through 1000 bootstrap resamples. Performance was compared with fixed-location measures at 22.5% and 25.0% from the medial edge of the tibial plateau.

RESULTS

Orthogonal minimum joint space width demonstrated strong discriminative performance, with area under the curve values of 0.86, 0.95 and 0.97 for joint space narrowing greater than grades 0, 1 and 2, respectively - exceeding the corresponding values for fixed-location measures by absolute margins of 0.04-0.08. Pooled relative standardised response mean analysis showed consistently higher responsiveness for orthogonal minimum joint space width, with median values of 0.97, 0.95 and 0.91 for baseline narrowing grades 0, 1 and 2, representing approximately 2%-4% greater responsiveness than fixed-location measures across all strata.

CONCLUSIONS

Orthogonal minimum joint space width, automatically quantified by deep learning, enhances both sensitivity and specificity for assessing knee osteoarthritis severity and progression. This metric may serve as a robust and reproducible structural imaging endpoint for clinical trials and longitudinal research.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

The original paper.

Deep learning-derived orthogonal minimum joint space width improves radiographic assessment of knee osteoarthritis severity and progression

Do Weon Lee, Dae Seok Song, Yong Seuk Lee, Ja-Young Choi, Du Hyun Ro
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy · 2025

Reviewed academic journal articles