R.Du Hyun RoOrthopedics & Research
Text
Paper Library
shared decision makingTKAstudy protocol

2026 · Journal of Korean Medical Science

How Will a Shared Decision-making Model Adapted to Korean Culture Be Evaluated?

The publication is a clinical-trial protocol, with no intervention-effect estimates. It defines the five SDM steps and the primary outcome measure, SDM-Q-9.

Participants and Methods

A planned multicenter pragmatic comparative cohort includes 1,300 patients with KL 3–4 across 5 hospitals and a 50-patient nested cohort. The primary outcome is Korean SDM-Q-9, with decisional conflict, regret and knowledge changes. The contralateral-TKA nested cohort plans pain/function assessment at 3 and 12 months.

The order in which you read the painting.

The five-step model separates preparation before consultation from discussion during consultation. This is the structure of an intervention planned for evaluation, rather than a figure showing treatment effects. 1,300 patients and 5 hospitals describe the plan. SDM-Q-9 measures perceived shared decision-making, not surgical performance. The design first elicits preferences, values and options. Multicenter evaluation must consider feasibility, selection bias and actual intervention fidelity.

Main Findings

The publication is a clinical-trial protocol, with no intervention-effect estimates. It defines the five SDM steps and the primary outcome measure, SDM-Q-9.

The point of reading on surgery

This study examines a structured care model that incorporates patients’ values and preferences when choosing between conservative treatment and surgery.

Limitations

This is a research protocol rather than a results paper. The 1,300 patients represent the planned sample, not a completed analysis.

Let's put it briefly.

What did this study confirm?

The publication is a clinical-trial protocol, with no intervention-effect estimates. It defines the five SDM steps and the primary outcome measure, SDM-Q-9.

Can it be applied directly to individual patients' treatment decisions?

This is a research protocol rather than a results paper. The 1,300 patients represent the planned sample, not a completed analysis.

Keywords

Abstract · Original text

Byung Sun Choi, Sujin Seo, Moon Jong Chang, Joong Il Kim, Seong Hwan Kim, Do Weon Lee, Du Hyun Ro, Hyoseon Choi, Hyuk-Soo Han. Study Protocol of a Korean Patient-Centered Shared Decision-Making Model for Management of Severe Knee Osteoarthritis: A Multicenter Pragmatic Clinical Trial (K-SDM-KOA). Journal of Korean medical science. 2026;41(4):e40. doi:10.3346/jkms.2026.41.e40.

Severe knee osteoarthritis (KOA) involves complex, preference-sensitive treatment decisions, ranging from non-operative to surgical options. However, despite the preference-sensitive nature of KOA, existing shared decision-making (SDM) processes often lack clarity in effectively incorporating patients' values and preferences into treatment decisions. Moreover, most SDM models have been developed in western contexts, which may limit their applicability in other cultural settings. To address these limitations, a Korean Shared Decision-Making Model for KOA (K-SDM-KOA) has been developed using a culturally adapted, five-step framework that integrates a web-based decision-support platform and age-friendly educational media. The K-SDM-KOA model is designed to support preference-sensitive decision-making through a pragmatic, multicenter cohort framework involving 1,300 patients with Kellgren-Lawrence grade 3-4 across five hospitals. Within this framework, patients receive either standard care or the K-SDM-KOA intervention, which combines pre-consultation preparation (step 1-3) with in-clinic deliberation and decision-making (step 4-5). The primary outcome is patient-perceived SDM measured using the Korean-validated 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire, reported on a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating greater SDM. Secondary outcomes include patients' preferred role in decision-making, decisional conflict, decision regret, and knowledge gain related to KOA. Additionally, a nested cohort of 50 patients undergoing contralateral total knee arthroplasty will provide paired analyses of early pain and function (visual analogue scale, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Knee Society Score) at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months. Analyses will follow an intention-to-treat principle and employ linear mixed-effect models and appropriate statistical tests to assess between group differences. This article presents a culturally tailored, technology-supported SDM model designed to enhance decision quality and early patient-reported outcomes in severe KOA. Findings may provide a foundation for future empirical studies and support the broader adoption of structured SDM in Korea's healthcare system.

© 2026 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences.

The original paper.

Study Protocol of a Korean Patient-Centered Shared Decision-Making Model for Management of Severe Knee Osteoarthritis: A Multicenter Pragmatic Clinical Trial (K-SDM-KOA)

Byung Sun Choi, Sujin Seo, Moon Jong Chang, Joong Il Kim, Seong Hwan Kim, Do Weon Lee, Du Hyun Ro, Hyoseon Choi, Hyuk-Soo Han
Journal of Korean Medical Science · 2026

Research protocols that have been reviewed