R.Du Hyun Ro整形外科と研究の話
文字
論文資料室
AISPINLSTVspine

2025 · Journal of Clinical Medicine

腰仙移行椎を側面X線で自動検出できますか?

試験AUCは0.84、感度85.1%、特異度61.9%、正確度76.4%でした。

研究の数値から読む結果

分離した313画像のテストセットで、感度85.1%、特異度61.9%、正確度76.4%でした。図を拡大する

分離した313画像のテストセットで、感度85.1%、特異度61.9%、正確度76.4%でした。

Journal of Clinical Medicine (2025). DOI: 10.3390/jcm14217671 · Original explanatory chart based on reported data

根拠・原著画像の利用条件

研究で問うこと

腰仙移行椎を側面X線で自動検出できますか?

対象と方法

立位腰椎側面3,116画像を後ろ向きに解析しました。全脊椎画像・CT・MRIを基準に分類し、ResNet-50などを比較しました。 同施設の分離した試験313画像で評価しました。外部施設検証ではありません。

主な結果

試験AUCは0.84、感度85.1%、特異度61.9%、正確度76.4%でした。

診療・手術で考える点

脊椎手術前の分節確認を助ける研究です。SPINの角度測定とは別の検出課題です。

解釈の限界

正常例の偽陽性と微細な移行形態の見逃しがありました。誤った手術分節を減らす実際の効果は評価していません。

簡単に説明しましょう

どの診療上の問いにつながりますか?

脊椎手術前の分節確認を助ける研究です。SPINの角度測定とは別の検出課題です。

Keywords・キーワード

Abstract・原文の抄録

Donghyuk Kwak, Du Hyun Ro, Dong-Ho Kang. Automated Detection of Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae on Plain Lumbar Radiographs Using a Deep Learning Model. Journal of clinical medicine. 2025;14(21):7671. doi:10.3390/jcm14217671.

Background/Objectives: Lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV) is a common anatomical variant, but its identification on plain radiographs is often inconsistent. This inconsistency can lead to clinical complications such as chronic low back pain, misinterpretation of spinal parameters, and an increased risk of wrong-level surgery. This study aimed to develop and validate a deep learning-based artificial intelligence (AI) model for the automated detection of LSTV on plain lumbar radiographs. Methods: This retrospective observational study included a total of 3116 standing lumbar lateral radiographs. The presence or absence of lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV) was definitively established using whole-spine imaging, CT, or MRI. Multiple deep learning architectures, including DINOv2, CLIP (ViT-B/32), and ResNet-50, were initially evaluated for binary classification of LSTV. Among these, the ResNet-50 model with partial fine-tuning achieved the best test performance and was subsequently selected for fivefold cross-validation using the training set. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and interpretability was evaluated using gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM). Results: On the independent test set of 313 radiographs, the final model demonstrated robust diagnostic performance. It achieved an accuracy of 76.4%, a sensitivity of 85.1%, a specificity of 61.9%, and an AUC of 0.84. The model correctly identified 166 out of 195 LSTV cases and 73 out of 118 normal cases. Conclusions: This AI-based system offers a highly accurate and reliable method for the automated detection of LSTV on plain radiographs. It shows strong potential as a clinical decision-support tool to reduce diagnostic errors, improve pre-operative planning, and enhance patient safety.

© 2025 by the authors.

オリジナル紙だ

Automated Detection of Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae on Plain Lumbar Radiographs Using a Deep Learning Model

Donghyuk Kwak, Du Hyun Ro, Dong-Ho Kang
Journal of Clinical Medicine · 2025

学術的な議論