R.노두현정형외과와 연구 이야기
글자
논문 자료실
AIposterior tibial slopeexternal validationACL

2025 · Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine

한국에서 개발한 PTS 모델은 노르웨이 ACL 환자의 짧은 영상에도 적용될까?

자동과 수동 측정 간 ICC는 0.73–0.80, 수동 평가자 간 ICC는 0.86, 평가자 내 ICC는 0.92, 모델 반복 ICC는 1.00이었습니다.

원문 Figure 1.

짧은 측면 영상에서 경골 윤곽과 2A·3A 기준으로 축을 구하는 예시입니다. 영상에 표시된 점과 선을 직접 확인할 수 있습니다.그림 크게 보기

짧은 측면 영상에서 경골 윤곽과 2A·3A 기준으로 축을 구하는 예시입니다. 영상에 표시된 점과 선을 직접 확인할 수 있습니다.

Kyle R Martin, Sanna Haaland, Andreas Persson, Sung Eun Kim, ByeongYeong Ryu, Jun Woo Nam, Du Hyun Ro, Eivind Inderhaug. External Validation of a Novel Landmark-Based Deep Learning Automated Tibial Slope Measurement Algorithm Applied on Short Radiographs Obtained in Patients With ACL Injuries. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (2025). DOI: 10.1177/23259671251333607. © The Author(s) 2025

근거·원문그림 이용조건
원문 캡션

Automated measurement of the posterior tibial slope on a short lateral knee radiograph using the 2A/3A method, demonstrating a slope …

연구에서 묻는 질문

한국에서 개발한 PTS 모델은 노르웨이 ACL 환자의 짧은 영상에도 적용될까?

대상과 방법

연속된 측면 영상을 이용했습니다. 숙련 판독자 두 명의 2-circle 수동 측정과 자동 short module의 ICC·시간을 비교했습니다. 289 radiographs; 평균 29.7세. 476장을 선별했습니다.

주요 결과

자동과 수동 측정 간 ICC는 0.73–0.80, 수동 평가자 간 ICC는 0.86, 평가자 내 ICC는 0.92, 모델 반복 ICC는 1.00이었습니다. 수동 측정은 52.5초, 자동은 28.2초였습니다. 영상의 95%에서는 일치도가 양호했으나 차이가 가장 큰 5%의 ICC는 0.02였습니다.

진료와 수술에서 읽을 지점

ACL 수술 평가에 대한 외부 성능을 확인했지만 outlier의 수동 검토 필요성도 보여줍니다.

해석의 제한

극단적 outlier가 있습니다. 수동 2-circle과 자동 landmark의 기준은 완전히 같지 않습니다. 완전한 반복 재현성이 절대적 측정 정확도를 뜻하지 않습니다.

짧게 정리하면

어떤 진료 질문과 연결되나요?

ACL 수술 평가에 대한 외부 성능을 확인했지만 outlier의 수동 검토 필요성도 보여줍니다.

Keywords · 주제어

Abstract · 원문 초록

Kyle R Martin, Sanna Haaland, Andreas Persson, Sung Eun Kim, ByeongYeong Ryu, Jun Woo Nam, Du Huy Ro, Eivind Inderhaug. External Validation of a Novel Landmark-Based Deep Learning Automated Tibial Slope Measurement Algorithm Applied on Short Radiographs Obtained in Patients With ACL Injuries. Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine. 2025;13(5):23259671251333607. doi:10.1177/23259671251333607.

BACKGROUND

Deep learning algorithms can aid medical decision-making by performing routine tasks without any human error. Reading of standardized radiographs lends itself well to a computerized approach. The posterior tibial slope is increasingly recognized as a factor in lower leg biomechanics. Slope readings should, therefore, be readily available when considering knee ligament or knee replacement surgery.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose was to externally validate a deep learning model developed for posterior tibial slope readings by applying an independent data set, not included in initial development, for testing the reliability of the model, compared with human performance testing. It was hypothesized that a computerized approach would yield a reliability similar to that of human analyses.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

A consecutive series of lateral knee radiographs obtained in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament surgery were eligible for inclusion. Two independent experienced clinicians individually assessed the tibial slope measurement to establish the interreader reliability. Furthermore, all images were processed by the newly developed model for the automated readings. Intrarater and interrater reliability were thereafter established between readers and between manual and automated readings, measured by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Time consumption between methods was noted. Extreme differences between the 2 methods were analyzed for potential errors.

RESULTS

A total of 289 radiographs were included in the study and therefore analyzed by both the manual and the automated method. A mean tibial slope of 9.7° (SD, 2.7°; range, 3.0°-19.1°) was found. The interrater and intrarater measurements between the independent measurers for the 2-circle method were 0.86 and 0.92. Furthermore, the intrarater agreement of the model was 1.00, while an ICC between 0.73 and 0.80 was found when comparing automated with manual measurement. The mean time consumption for manual readings was 52.5 seconds, while for automated readings it was 28.2 seconds.

CONCLUSION

In this external validation of a newly developed model for automated readings of tibial slope measures, a perfect intrarater reliability and a good interrater reliability were seen. Although the model needs further refinement in reporting the tibial slope as compared with a gold standard manual measurement, it clearly demonstrates the elimination of human variance with repeat readings and less time consumption than that with human effort.

© The Author(s) 2025

원래 논문

External Validation of a Novel Landmark-Based Deep Learning Automated Tibial Slope Measurement Algorithm Applied on Short Radiographs Obtained in Patients With ACL Injuries

Kyle R Martin, Sanna Haaland, Andreas Persson, Sung Eun Kim, ByeongYeong Ryu, Jun Woo Nam, Du Hyun Ro, Eivind Inderhaug
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine · 2025

심사된 학술지 논문